It sounds like something straight out of a conspiracy theorist’s diary – claims of a deep-state cover-up of retrieved extraterrestrial craft and the remains of their pilots. But these allegations didn’t come from an obscure source. Instead, they were made by a respected former intelligence officer who had worked with the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). This organization is tasked with identifying unidentified objects near military assets.
While media giants like the Washington Post and Politico opted out of covering the story, it found a platform on The Debrief, a science and defense site. The claims were later picked up by Vox and a New York Times podcast, granting them a broader audience.
At the center of these claims is whistleblower David Grusch. However, Grusch has confessed to never having seen the supposed detritus of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), the new, official term for UFOs. He doesn’t possess firsthand evidence but shares what he’s been told by unnamed sources. Despite this, Grusch offered nearly 11 hours of classified testimony to congressional investigators.
According to Leslie Kean, one of The Debrief’s co-writers, nobody at Grusch’s level has ever spoken about the alleged extraterrestrial cover-up by the federal government. Supporters of Grusch believe his withholding of further details is understandable due to classification. They also point out that lying to the inspector general or Congress would be a crime.
Skeptics, however, question the validity of Grusch’s revelations. They find it unlikely that the Pentagon would authorize the release of such impactful information if it were true. Moreover, they question the government’s capability to maintain a cover-up of such magnitude for so long.
A small fraction of UAP sightings remains unexplained. In the pursuit of truth, BU Today reached out to Joshua Semeter, a College of Engineering professor and director of BU’s Center for Space Physics. He’s also part of a NASA team assigned to report later this year on what we know about UAPs.
Semeter acknowledged the story but refrained from speculating on Grusch’s motives. He pointed out that Grusch’s claims lack verifiable evidence and personal experience with the alleged objects. He quoted Carl Sagan’s famous line: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
Semeter’s study panel collaborates with the Defense Department’s AARO to bring scientific rigor to UAP claims. They treat Grusch as a credible witness but lack the data or material evidence to evaluate his allegations.
Semeter revealed that their panel would issue a report later this year. Their role is not to analyze historical or current UAP data but to create a roadmap for how NASA assets and expertise can contribute to determining the origin and nature of UAPs. They admit that if extraordinary evidence emerges, it would undoubtedly affect their report.
The story surrounding Grusch’s claims represents a fascinating intersection of extraterrestrial theories, whistleblowing, and government operations. As we await further developments and the NASA team’s report, the saga serves as a reminder that sometimes truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. (Source)
Blazing a Trail of Laughter and Chronic.
